Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

U.S. Weighs Limited Options to Punish China Over Hong Kong

Monday, July 13, 2020

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats National Preparedness

Comments: 0

As U.S. officials weigh sanctioning China over its recent moves in Hong Kong, the city’s status as a global financial center limits the menu of effective levers available to Washington.

Major actions against Hong Kong’s financial system risk hitting U.S., Western and Hong Kong companies and consumers, officials and analysts say. More targeted sanctions against Chinese officials and trade measures against products made in Hong Kong would have little impact on Beijing’s integration of the city into the mainland’s political and security system, these people say.

Trump administration officials discussed Hong Kong plans Thursday in a White House meeting, according to people familiar with the gathering. Officials will regroup early this week and may announce sanctions or other measures, one official said.

“You want to find sanctions that hurt the perpetrators of the law without shooting yourself in the foot, and it’s a difficult exercise,” said Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and a former senior U.S. trade official. “There are a lot of options, but none of them are great.”

Beijing last month unveiled a new security law that gives the mainland greater role in policing and limiting political movements on the territory, a step that the U.S., U.K. and other Western countries say violates the “one country, two systems” principle and the treaty that transferred Hong Kong to Chinese administration in 1997.

China has warned the Trump administration to stay out of what it describes as a domestic political matter, and has threatened to retaliate against measures the U.S. levels against it.

“China and the U.S. should not seek to remodel each other,” Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Thursday in a speech in Beijing. “Instead, they must work together to find ways to peaceful coexistence of different systems and civilizations.”

President Trump in May laid out possible steps Washington would consider if Beijing went ahead with its security law, including ending both the U.S.’s extradition treaty with Hong Kong and the territory’s special trade and travel status for exports and travelers. But so far the administration has only announced it would prevent an unknown number of Chinese citizens from getting visas and limit military and security-related exports to Hong Kong.

Some State Department officials have discussed the possibility of undercutting Hong Kong as a top financial center—one that benefits China—by taking steps to destroy Hong Kong’s pegged exchange rate to the U.S. dollar, according to two people familiar with the discussions.

But a senior Trump administration official said that the move against Hong Kong’s currency has been excluded from the measures under consideration, at least in the near term. Also, many U.S. economic officials would oppose major new financial sanctions when the global economy is swooning under the coronavirus pandemic.

The State Department declined to comment on economic policies toward Hong Kong. The White House declined to comment.

A more likely option is a suite of narrowly targeted sanctions, current and former U.S. officials say. The House and Senate unanimously passed a law this month enabling the State and Treasury departments to impose sanctions on people or entities involved in carrying out the Hong Kong security law. It would also target banks that facilitate significant transactions involving those people or entities.

Mr. Trump is expected to sign the bill, given the broad congressional support, say people following the legislation. The administration is already likely able to rely on previous authorizations for targeted sanctions, including a 2019 law aimed at Beijing’s moves in Hong Kong after massive protests erupted on the territory.

“Washington will probably impose some sanctions on midlevel Chinese officials over the new Hong Kong law, but it will avoid actions that threaten the territory’s financial stability or its peg against the dollar,” Michael Hirson, the top China expert at the Eurasia Group, wrote Friday in a note.

Mr. Trump has previously hesitated to confront China over certain issues, given the concerns over negotiations to end the tit-for-tat trade war he pursued upon taking office. He signed a “phase-one” trade agreement in January that requires China to purchase tens of billions of extra U.S. exports this year. China isn’t on track to meet those purchase requirements this year.

China experts expect the U.S. to soon cancel its extradition treaty with Hong Kong due to concerns about the lack of independent police and courts on the territory under China’s new security law. Mr. Trump has already threatened to end it. The president also has mentioned the possibility of ending Hong Kong’s special trade and travel status.

Mainland Chinese goods still face tariffs, even after the phase-one trade deal. Yet Hong Kong’s exports to the U.S. last year totaled just $4.7 billion, compared with $452 billion from the mainland.

Last month, U.S. lawmakers from both parties introduced a bill to give refugee status to Hong Kong residents at risk of persecution under the new national security law.

In the U.K., Prime Minister Boris Johnson said his government plans to change immigration rules to permit as many as 3 million holders of British national (overseas) passports to stay and work in the U.K. for five years on a path to citizenship.

With overall U.S.-China tensions still rising, friction over Hong Kong may be wrapped into overall pressure on Beijing, much as Russia’s annexation of Crimea presaged friction and sanctions in other areas.

The U.S. is considering taking further steps against China’s hacking efforts targeting the U.S., the senior official said. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, when asked this past week during a Fox News interview if the U.S. should ban Chinese social-media apps including TikTok, said the government was looking into the issue.

This month the U.S. sent two aircraft carriers to the South China Sea, which extends south of Hong Kong and surrounds islands disputed among China and other Asian nations. The Treasury and State departments last week imposed sanctions against top officials in China’s Xinjiang region over the treatment of Uighur Muslims and other minority groups there.

Mr. Pompeo met his Chinese counterpart Yang Jiechi in Hawaii last month for a gathering seen as an effort to derail escalating tensions. U.S. officials didn’t cite any concrete progress coming from the meeting.

Photo: The Hong Kong stock exchange. The territory’s status as a world financial center complicates U.S. efforts to respond to China’s new security law. - PHOTO: VINCENT YU/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-weighs-limited-options-to-punish-china-over-hong-kong-11594576800

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search