Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

The GOP Should Love the SALT Deduction - By John Tamny

Wednesday, July 7, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-gop-should-love-the-salt-deduction-11624918429?mod=searchresults_pos1&page=1

Copies of tax regulations during a markup on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on Capitol Hill, Nov. 15, 2017. PHOTO: AARON BERNSTEIN/REUTERS

Will President Biden seek to repeal the $10,000 cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes, known as SALT? Many conservatives say the SALT cap, part of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, should remain in place because repeal would primarily aid high-income households in Democratic states. Open and shut case for Republicans, right? Not so fast.

For one thing, they should support any change in the tax code that reduces the burden on the rich. Precisely because they’re already wealthy, the rich are most capable of investing unspent wealth. By reducing their tax burden, repeal of the SALT cap would expand the capital base that matches commercial ideas with investment.

The standard argument against repealing the cap is that low-tax, mostly Republican-leaning states would end up subsidizing waste in high-tax Democratic ones. That’s one way of looking at it—the wrong way. It ignores that the top 1% of taxpayers account for around 40% of federal tax revenue. They, not their states, would receive the benefit of the SALT deduction.

At the same time, Republicans have long believed that the federal government should be limited in size and scope so that Americans exercise democratic choice at the state and local level. Cities and states, in this view, should be the laboratories for domestic policy.

Repealing the SALT cap might not restore that vision, but it would direct money away from Washington and toward states and localities. The SALT cap is manna from heaven for national politicians eager to expand the federal government, all the while shrinking the ability of cities and states to tax, and therefore to control their own policies. Basically the cap turns the Founders’ vision of a federal government with powers “few and defined” on its ahead.

Republicans should press Mr. Biden to endorse repeal of the SALT deduction, which aggrandizes and encourages the growth of national government. Better yet, they could one-up him by replacing the deduction with a SALT credit against federal taxes paid. State taxes would likely rise, but that beats sending more money to Washington.

Mr. Tamny is vice president at FreedomWorks and author of “When Politicians Panicked: The New Coronavirus, Expert Opinion, and a Tragic Lapse of Reason.”

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search