Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Report: U.S. Reviewing All Military and Intelligence Assets in Britain After Boris Johnson’s Huawei Deal

Thursday, May 7, 2020

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats National Preparedness

Comments: 0

The U.S. has begun a review of every military and intelligence asset in the UK following security concerns that have been raised over Boris Johnson’s decision to allow Chinese tech giant Huawei to help build the nation’s 5G network, security sources claim.

The Pentagon, the State Department, and 17 intelligence agencies are reportedly carrying out the review which will determine whether classified intelligence and military actions, personnel, and equipment should be moved out of Britain.

A former member of the White House’s National Security Council (NSC) reportedly told The Telegraph that it was “likely” that the review would result in military assets being removed from the UK.

“This was not a bluff. You cannot mitigate the danger Boris Johnson is exposing the UK to by letting Huawei into the network,” the former official said.

“This review is not a punishment. This is the White House saying ‘okay, if they’re going to go down this path and put themselves at risk then how do we protect ourselves,'” the source explained.

Among the primary targets for removal is believed to be a group of American RC-135 reconnaissance aircraft that have been used to gather information from the battlefield in the war against Islamic State. The spy planes are officially stationed in Nebraska; however in practice they spend most of their time at RAF Mildenhall in Suffolk, England, where some 500 American troops are based.

The status of American intelligence operatives stationed in the country has also come into question, as officials fear that the United Kingdom’s 5G network could compromise the personal phones of U.S. agents, while they are conducting classified missions in Britain.

Boris Johnson’s government has claimed that Huawei will only have access to the ‘periphery’ of the United Kingdom’s 5G network, preventing the company from accessing the “core” of the system.

In April, Sir Simon McDonald, the Foreign Office’s permanent undersecretary, said that the British government had made a “firm decision” to allow the Chinese company to help build the network.

“China is a very important partner of the United Kingdom, and I think it’s compatible to proceed with the Huawei decision and have the strategically independent relationship that I have been talking about,” Sir Simon added.

Officials from the United States have long warned their British counterparts that allowing Huawei to help construct the country’s 5G network could compromise security, as they believe the Chinese telecommunications company has the capability of building backdoor access into its systems.

“Britain is forcing us into a corner to make decisions and ponder consequences that we don’t want to make or ponder,” a Republican congressional aid said.

“We would rather the special relationship be renewed and revitalised in this new era of great power competition, but it is difficult to do when genuine security interests were discarded,” he added.

The final decision on what, if any, American assets will be removed from the country has yet to be determined, with President Donald Trump needing to sign off on any military move.

Photo: PAU BARRENA/AFP/Getty Images

Link: https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2020/05/06/report-us-reviewing-military-intelligence-assets-britain-huawei-deal/

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search