Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Report: China Torturing Thousands of Dissidents to Force Confessions

Thursday, October 7, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Terrorism

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2021/10/06/report-china-torturing-thousands-dissidents-force-confessions/

WANG ZHAO/AFP via Getty Images

Human rights organization Safeguard Defenders said Tuesday that China is holding thousands of prisoners in secret prisons, including political dissidents and human rights activists, and using physical and psychological torture to force them to sign confessions.

Safeguard Defenders published a report in June on these practices titled Locked Up: Inside China’s Secret RSDL Jails. Tuesday marked the first publication of the report in Chinese.

RDSL stands for Residential Surveillance at a Designated Location. Safeguard Defenders calls it a “system of state-sanctioned kidnapping” and a “legalized form of black jail” enforced with “virtually no judicial oversight.”

According to Locked Up, the RDSL system was created in 2013, the same year Xi Jinping became the president of China. Victims are grabbed by a swarm of Chinese security officers who strike without warning, usually very late at night, although broad daylight kidnappings were also documented. Most victims said they were violently subdued without warning and never given a chance to come quietly.

The targets are not always shown any credentials, warrants, or paperwork during their arrest, but the security officers make a point of filming the arrest in great detail, usually with more than one camera.

The bound and hooded abductee is sometimes processed at a local police station for a few days, but often they are whisked straight to an RDSL black site, which could be anything from a purpose-built black-hole prison to a repurposed military facility or apartment building.

Detainees are kept hooded throughout transport so they cannot identify where they are being held. Sometimes their families are not informed they were arrested, and when non-Chinese citizens are grabbed, their national embassies are not always notified. Among the foreigners subjected to RDSL were Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, the Canadians held hostage by China to secure the release of Huawei executive and Communist Party leader Meng Wanzhou.

One thing the RDSL facilities all have in common is extensive surveillance, both human and electronic. The victims are not allowed to communicate with the outside world. The facilities are also carefully designed to make suicide difficult for the tormented captives.

The RDSL survivors interviewed by Safeguard Defenders reported being subjected to appalling and internationally illegal torture by Chinese security officers, much of it strongly reminiscent of the accounts given by Uyghurs held in the concentration camps of Xinjiang province – including extensive use of the “tiger chair,” a metal apparatus that forces prisoners to hold agonizing positions for extended periods of time.

One of the prisoners interviewed for the report, human rights lawyer Chang Weiping, said he was strapped into a tiger chair for six days straight while being denied food and sleep.

“Life in RSDL is defined by isolation, boredom and fear. Your only company will be the two guards assigned to watch you 24 hours a day (even when you go to the toilet) and, when they come, your interrogators,” Locked Up explained.

Other torments described by RDSL survivors include forced ingestion of dubious “medications,” denial of access to real medicine even for those with serious illness, painful beatings administered in a way that leaves no visible marks, sexual humiliation of female prisoners, constant threats against both prisoners and their families, and endless “interrogations.”

Survivors agreed the top priority of RDSL is to pressure prisoners into signing confessions. Many were forced to write numerous drafts of confessions until they produced one that satisfied their captors. Outgoing prisoners are also forced to sign pledges that they will not discuss what was done to them in RDSL, give interviews to the media, or lodge complaints with foreign governments.

Prisoners are often granted “Non-Release Release,” which means they are kept under house arrest or very heavy surveillance, including menacing official harassment and limits on their travel.

According to Locked Up, over 57,000 people have been subjected to RDSL since 2013, and the system tends to be even worse in practice than it looks on paper.

“They give the police huge powers to detain people in secret facilities and cut them off from any contact with the outside world, and don’t tell anyone where they are. It’s the same as disappearing,” Safeguard Defenders researcher Chen Yanting told Radio Free Asia (RFA) Tuesday.

“The stipulated limit to such detentions is six months, but actually we have records of some cases where it lasted as long as four years,” Chen said.

Safeguard Defenders urged the international community to take stronger action against RDSL as a blatant violation of human rights by the Chinese government.

The United Nations human rights commission expressed “grave concern” about the practice in March 2020, citing several cases of human rights activists held at black sites for merely attending an informal gathering.

“It has also unfortunately become common practice for Chinese authorities to provide limited or conflicting information on the victims and the charges they face. The families are often kept in the dark about the well-being of their loved ones,” the U.N. Office for the High Commissioner on Human Rights said.

In December 2020, U.N. special rapporteur for human rights Mary Lawlor said she was “shocked” by China’s use of RDSL against human rights activists and their lawyers, citing the above-mentioned Chang Weiping as an example.

Lawlor noted that the threat of RDSL was enough to intimidate lawyers away from representing political dissidents, fearing they too would be swept away to hidden prisons with black bags over their heads. “The profession of human rights lawyer has been effectively criminalized in China,” she said.

The U.N. said in March 2020 its experts were holding a “dialogue” with Chinese officials on RDSL and would “closely monitor the situation,” but according to Safeguard Defenders, the abuses have continued.

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search