Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

North Korean Leader Kim Jong Un’s Return Affirms Status Quo in Talks

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats Missile Defense

Comments: 0

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s appearance in state media, after a near three-week absence set off rumors about his health, reaffirms a status quo that is unlikely to shake up stalled denuclearization talks with the U.S. or change the regime’s pattern of weapons testing.

Mr. Kim’s attendance at an event on Friday, seemingly healthy and in charge, ended speculation of a leadership shake-up that could reorient Pyongyang’s approach to nuclear talks or provocation. With Kim still leading the country, close North Korea watchers anticipate an uneventful year for denuclearization talks ahead of the U.S. presidential election in November.

Talks between the U.S. and North Korea remain gridlocked, having made no discernible progress since early last year and the three high-profile meetings between the two countries’ leaders. Pyongyang has already conducted multiple weapons tests this year. President Trump has a long list of domestic issues to handle, including the Covid-19 pandemic and his re-election campaign. Mr. Kim has warned sanctions bruising the regime’s economy may be around for a while.

“The age of talking is kind of over,” said Olivia Enos, a senior policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center, in Washington. Even with Mr. Kim alive, she added, “it’s pretty unlikely there would be any summit before November.”

North Korea signaled a diplomatic slowdown early this year, when Mr. Kim, in a policy speech published Jan. 1, declared talks with Washington were over unless the U.S. dropped its “hostile policy” toward the isolated regime. The North Korean leader urged citizens to tighten their belts and gird for a protracted life under sanctions—calling it a “fait accompli.” He vowed to never trade the country’s dignity for economic relief.

Pyongyang reaffirmed that stance in late March, after Secretary of State Mike Pompeo publicly urged other Group of Seven nations to maintain diplomatic and economic pressure against the Kim regime. “We will go our own way. We want the U.S. not to bother us,” a senior North Korean official was quoted as saying in a March 30 state-media report.

The two countries haven’t held formal talks since October. Security experts say the U.S. presidential election campaign could serve as a catalyst for talks with the Trump administration, if former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive Democratic nominee, looks likely to win in November. Mr. Trump could reach out to the North to score a foreign-policy victory to impress voters, or Mr. Kim could try to strike a sanctions deal before a changeover in the U.S. administration, though Mr. Trump is unlikely to cede much ground, said Andrew Yeo, a specialist in North Korean studies at Catholic University of America in Washington.

“Time is definitely more on North Korea’s side,” Mr. Yeo said.

The two sides still have yet to square key differences over how, and when, Pyongyang should relinquish its nuclear arsenal. The U.S. leverage rests with maintaining international sanctions that block Mr. Kim from delivering his promise to revitalize the regime’s cash-strapped economy.

But the North Korean leader, barring an overthrow of his regime, has a lifetime appointment, giving him some ability to wait and see if U.S. strategies shift over time. Mr. Biden, at a January presidential debate in Iowa, said he wouldn’t meet Mr. Kim unconditionally.

The Trump administration has touted the North’s lack of nuclear tests or intercontinental ballistic missile launches as a sign its approach is working. But Mr. Kim early this year said he no longer felt bound to a moratorium on long-range testing, even promising to unveil a new strategic weapon soon.

North Korea experts expect the Kim regime to continue short- and medium-range weapons launches this year, though they see any major tests as unlikely, knowing that Mr. Trump is unlikely to yield much in negotiation concessions with the November elections not far away, said Kim Heung-Kyu, a political-science professor at South Korea’s Ajou University.

“North Korea’s course is already set,” Prof. Kim said. “They know Trump will be OK so long as they don’t test ICBMs, and allow Trump to brag about his supposed success with North Korea.”

The prospects for a return to dialogue with the North may rest less on sanctions relief than on the threat of the coronavirus. Pyongyang has claimed it has zero confirmed coronavirus cases to date, though health experts familiar with the North’s health system remain skeptical.

The U.S. and South Korea have offered coronavirus assistance, and if the North’s situation falls into a humanitarian crisis, it could force the Kim regime to engage, security experts say.

North Korea canceled two mass celebrations in February, including a Feb. 16 commemoration honoring the birthday of Kim Jong Il, the leader’s father. Photographs taken at Friday’s event, held at a fertilizer factory north of Pyongyang, showed hundreds of attendees wearing face masks—though Kim Jong Un and his close aides didn’t.

South Korea’s government believes Mr. Kim didn’t have a medical procedure during the 20-day stretch when he didn’t appear in state media, a presidential Blue House official told reporters on Sunday. Seoul had strongly asserted over the past week that Mr. Kim was alive and well.

The fallout from Mr. Kim’s return to the public eye continued Monday, when two high-profile North Korean defectors—both of whom won seats last month in South Korea’s legislature—apologized for their speculation. Ji Seong-ho, who won global attention for hoisting his crutches at Mr. Trump’s 2018 State of the Union address, expressed regret after claiming he was 99% sure Mr. Kim was dead.

Thae Yong-ho, a former senior Pyongyang diplomat, had said he believed Mr. Kim’s condition was so bad he couldn’t stand. “One of the reasons I was elected was to offer accurate analysis and prospects about North Korea,” Mr. Thae said in a Monday apology. “But the high amount of expectation is matched by my disappointment.”

Photo: People in a park in Pyongyang on Saturday watch a state-media broadcast showing leader Kim Jong Un attending a ceremony to mark the opening of a fertilizer factory. - CHA SONG HO/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Link: https://www.wsj.com/articles/north-korean-leaders-return-to-public-eye-affirms-status-quo-in-talks-11588595894

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search