Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Federal Lawsuit Poses First Challenge to Ban on Teaching Critical Race Theory

Thursday, October 28, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.usnews.com/news/education-news/articles/2021-10-20/federal-lawsuit-poses-first-challenge-to-ban-on-teaching-critical-race-theory

Signs are seen on a bench during a rally against "critical race theory" (CRT) being taught in schools in Leesburg, Virginia, on June 12.(ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP VIA GETTY IMAGES)

A coalition of educators and civil rights groups sued the state of Oklahoma over a law that restricts what can be taught about racism and gender in public schools as well as public colleges and universities – the first federal lawsuit to challenge one of several laws passed by Republican-controlled states seeking to ban critical race theory.

The lawsuit, filed by the American Civil Liberties Union, the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law and others, argues that House Bill 1775 violates the free speech of students and teachers and denies students of color, LGBTQ students and girls the opportunity to learn their history.

The law, which Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt, a Republican, signed into law in May, prohibits the teaching that people – consciously or unconsciously – are inherently racist, sexist or oppressive.

"All young people deserve to learn an inclusive and accurate history in schools, free from censorship or discrimination," says Emerson Sykes, staff attorney with the ACLU Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project.

"HB 1775 is so poorly drafted," Sykes says, "that districts and teachers have no way of knowing what concepts and ideas are prohibited. The bill was intended to inflame a political reaction, not further a legitimate educational interest."

Oklahoma is just one of eight Republican-controlled states that has passed laws aimed at censoring discussions around race and gender in classrooms, prompted by a conservative-led backlash to critical race theory. Dozens more are considering similar legislation, and bills have been filed by Republicans in Congress as well – though the federal government is prohibited by law from influencing or dictating school curriculum.

The culture war touched off two years ago when The New York Times published "The 1619 Project," plucking the concept of critical race theory out of academia and propelling into the public consciousness the idea that the racial inequality that's built into so much of how the U.S. operates today has its roots in slavery.

Critical race theory has since roiled Republicans in statehouses and in Congress, who see it as divisive. And it's become a buzzword for some in the GOP who are looking to exploit its politicization to fire up the party's base ahead of the 2022 midterms. It's led to a series of bills aiming to outlaw the teaching of critical race theory specifically or to prohibit contentious talks about racism, discrimination or privilege in general – even though the concept of critical race theory isn't taught in public schools.

In fact, just over half, or 56%, of students surveyed reported that they had opportunities to discuss race and racism "sometimes or a great deal" at school, according to a report from the nonpartisan America's Promise Alliance, an education organization that partnered with its research arm, the Boston University-affiliated Center for Promise and GradNation, an organization that advocates for higher graduation rates, as well as others. Only about 3 in 5 students reported that their school curriculum represented non-white communities "sometimes or a great deal."

The report concluded that "while police violence, protests, and calls for racial justice have occupied the public discourse in communities across the country, many students continue to lack access to opportunities to discuss race and racism within their classrooms."

Yet educators in states that have passed laws similar to Oklahoma's HB 1775 argue that they challenge their ability to accurately teach major U.S. history events by, for example, barring them from using words like "diversity" and "white privilege" and banning the use of books like "To Kill a Mockingbird" and "A Raisin in the Sun."

"Educators cannot adequately teach students about the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, the Trail of Tears, the Civil War, World War II, the Holocaust or any other cultural issue throughout U.S. history by silencing courageous classroom conversations that depict a more inclusive perspective of U.S. history," Anthony Douglas, president of the Oklahoma State Conference of the NAACP, says. "HB 1775 censors and chills the way Oklahoma teachers and students discuss fraught topics in state and U.S. history, particularly regarding racial mistreatment and injustice."

While conservative culture wars tend to flash, fizzle and fade, the obsession with critical race theory has proved otherwise. The debate is currently igniting protests at local school board meetings across the country – even when the issue is not on the agenda for discussion – and it's led to a spike in harassment, intimidation and threats of violence against board members.

Earlier this month, at the request of the National School Boards Association, the Department of Justice announced it planned to mobilize the FBI to work with state and local law enforcement leaders to outline strategies for addressing the incidents – a move that prompted backlash from Republicans.

While the lawsuit in Oklahoma is the first, it likely won't be the last, as educators in other states have begun teaching with the new restrictions in place.

For example, earlier this month, a school administrator at the Carroll Independent School District in Southlake, Texas, told teachers that if they assign students to read a book about the Holocaust, that they should also offer students access to a book with an "opposing" perspective.

"Just try to remember the concepts of [House Bill] 3979," the administrator said in a recording obtained by NBC News, referring to the new law in Texas. "And make sure that if you have a book on the Holocaust … that you have one that has an opposing, that has other perspectives."

"How do you oppose the Holocaust?" one teacher asked.

"Believe me," the administrator said. "That's come up."

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search