Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Erdogan Wants U.S. to Pay for Turkish Troops in Afghanistan

Thursday, July 22, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.breitbart.com/asia/2021/07/20/erdogan-wants-us-pay-turkish-troops-afghanistan/

ILYAS AKENGIN/AFP via Getty Images

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan on Tuesday demanded funding from the United States for a force of Turkish troops that could prospectively guard the airport in Kabul after U.S. forces complete their withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Erdogan reportedly said Turkey actually has three requirements for “taking over the management of Kabul airport,” including American diplomatic support and the handover of U.S. military infrastructure in Afghanistan to Turkish forces.

“There will be serious financial and administrative difficulties,” Erdogan added, saying America “will give the necessary support to Turkey in this respect as well.”

Erdogan waved aside the Taliban’s vigorous objections to any continued foreign military presence in Afghanistan. Last week, the Taliban warned of dire “consequences” for any “reprehensible” plan to protect the airport with foreign troops.

The Taliban denounced the proposal as “ill-advised, a violation of our sovereignty and territorial integrity, and against our national interests.”

“In the statement made by the Taliban, there is no phrase ‘we don’t want Turkey,’” Erdogan responded when asked about the threat on Monday.

The Taliban press release was literally entitled “Statement of Islamic Emirate Concerning Extension of Occupation by Turkish Forces in Afghanistan,” and it did specifically call on Turkey to withdraw all troops from Afghan soil.

Erdogan also poked back at the Taliban by urging them to “end the occupation of their brothers’ soil and show the world that peace is prevailing in Afghanistan right away,” a request the violent Islamist extremists are unlikely to either comply with or accept with good humor.

The Taliban said in June that it views the roughly 500 Turkish troops in Afghanistan as “part of NATO forces for the past 20 years,” and it expects them to “withdraw from Afghanistan on the basis of the agreement we signed with the U.S. on February 29, 2020,” along with the rest of NATO’s soldiers.

“Otherwise, Turkey is a great Islamic country. Afghanistan has had historical relations with it. We hope to have close and good relations with them as a new Islamic government is established in the country in future [sic],” a Taliban spokesman added in June. Erdogan and his ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) are openly politically Islamists.

Erdogan said Tuesday that he understands the Taliban has some “discomforts” with his airport plan but said the “process” will be discussed with Taliban leaders. He said the Taliban should “hold these talks much more comfortably with Turkey” than its prior negotiations with the United States, stressing Muslim solidarity against “imperial powers” and implying Turkey has supported Taliban resistance against American occupation for the past twenty years.

Reuters suggested Erdogan is hoping he can “soothe U.S. ties that are strained on several fronts, including [Turkey’s] purchase of Russian S-400 missile defenses,” by offering to defend the Kabul airport. The missile purchase violates NATO protocol, and they are not interoperable with the other militaries in the pact.

If this was indeed Erdogan’s goal, he might have refrained from insisting the U.S. bankroll the operation, suggesting Turkey supported two decades of murderous Taliban terrorism against American troops, and making his remarks on Tuesday from the island of Cyprus, where Turkey insists a mythical pro-Turkish government recognized by no other power controls half of the real estate. The day before Erdogan called on America to pay for Turkish troops in Afghanistan, he promised to spend lavish sums building a new government complex for the Turkish Cypriots.

The Afghan government has been somewhat lukewarm toward Turkey’s proposal. President Ashraf Ghani recently insisted that airport security is “the sole responsibility of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan,” while allowing that “any assistance offered by friendly nations is important.”

Other Afghan officials thanked Turkey for its support in July and expressed appreciation for Ankara’s negotiations with the Taliban. Ghani’s government appears nervous about defending its assets in Kabul from Taliban attack, and conscious that support from the rest of the world will become problematic if Hamid Karzai Airport is severely damaged or forced to shut down, but also worried about relying too obviously on foreign forces or conceding that its own troops cannot defend Kabul.

Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar insisted last week that progress has been made in talks with the Biden administration for Turkey to secure the Kabul airport. Akar said “a framework was drawn and work continues in specified fields.”

The Pentagon and State Department acknowledged that talks are ongoing and welcomed “Turkey’s constructive role,” without providing details on the status of those negotiations. At the very least, there is not much enthusiasm in Washington for sending American troops to protect the airport, and as a NATO member, Turkey could be the least unpalatable option.

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search