Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Defending Taiwan Against China Is Upholding US Democracy, Expert Says

Monday, November 1, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/defending-taiwan-against-china-is-upholding-us-democracy-expert-says_4079461.html

Two navy soldiers raise Taiwan's national flag during an official ceremony at a shipyard in Su'ao, a township in eastern Taiwan's Yilan County, on Dec. 15, 2020. (Sam Yeh/AFP via Getty Images)

The United States needs to defend Taiwan now more than ever, since the self-ruled island is part of the free world sitting at the forefront against China’s aggression, said Miles Yu, a senior fellow at the Washington-based think tank Hudson Institute.

“Taiwan is on the front line of the epic fight between tyranny and freedom. We already lost one battle … that is Hong Kong. So we should never allow the next Hong Kong to happen,” Yu told The Epoch Times’ sister media outlet NTD on Oct 29.

Yu previously served as the principal China policy adviser under former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. Now he is also a visiting fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institute.

The Chinese regime has dismantled Hong Kong’s autonomy and freedoms through a national security law, which Beijing implemented in the Chinese-ruled city in the summer of 2020. The controversial law punishes vaguely-defined crimes such as subversion.

The camp of tyranny is represented by the Chinese communist regime, Yu said, while Taiwan is part of the camp of freedom.

“So to defend Taiwan’s democracy is actually to defend in a way American democracy,” Yu said.

He added that democracies in the world defended West Berlin in 1948 and 1949, and these countries should come together to defend Taiwan “with confidence and with resolve.”

For nearly a year beginning in June 1948, Western powers airlifted food and supplies to allied-controlled areas of Berlin, after the Soviet Union blocked all rail, road, and canal access to the region that was home to about 2.5 million civilians.

“[China] has a grievance with everybody who loves freedom and democracy. … China has historical gripes against all the democracies around [its] periphery,” Yu said, pointing to South Korea, Japan, and India.

“So I see the defense of Taiwan is actually not only defending a democratic system, but it is also probably the best way to stop the momentum of this chain of aggression.”

The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sees Taiwan as part of its territory to be taken by force, if necessary. In early October, Chinese leader Xi Jinping vowed to achieve “reunification of the nation” in a speech and called the island’s independence a “serious hidden danger to national rejuvenation.”

The United States is currently not a formal diplomatic ally of Taiwan after Washington ended its diplomatic ties with Taipei in favor of Beijing in 1979.

US-Taiwan Ties
Currently, Washington maintains a decades-long foreign policy known as “strategic ambiguity,” meaning that the United States is deliberately vague on the question of whether it would come to Taiwan’s defense.

However, Washington is required by law—the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA)—to provide the island with military equipment for its self-defense.

Joseph Bosco, a member of the advisory board of the Washington-based Global Taiwan Institute, told NTD on Friday that the U.S. policy of “strategic ambiguity” should be called “destructive ambiguity” because it has not “deterred China from planning to attack Taiwan.”

Bosco served as China country director for the U.S. Secretary of Defense from 2005 to 2006. Now he is also a fellow at both the Institute for Corean-American Studies and the Institute for Taiwan-America Studies.

He said it is “probably unlikely” that China would launch a full-scale invasion against Taiwan, but the communist regime could escalate its pressure by taking over one of the islands controlled by Taipei.

“There are many ways they [China] can increase the pressure to see what kind of concessions they can get, either from Taiwan or from the United States,” Bosco said.

A recent virtual war game carried out by Washington-based think tank Center for a New American Security (CNAS) showed that Washington and Taipei were ill-prepared if China invaded Taiwan’s Pratas Islands (also known as Dongsha islands),” which lie about 190 miles southeast of Hong Kong.

China’s seizure of the Pratas Islands, located at the northern part of the South China Sea, would allow Beijing to create a choke point and disrupt regional shipping routes.

Bosco said the United States could further enhance ties with Taiwan by welcoming Taipei to join the Rim of the Pacific Exercise (RIMPAC), the biennial maritime military exercise hosted by the U.S. Pacific Fleet.

“China has expanded its domain economically, politically, diplomatically, [and] militarily,” he said.

“They’re [China] a threat to the region [and] they’re a threat to the world.”

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search