Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Chinese Officials Want National ‘Data Bank’ of Faces and Fingerprints

Friday, March 5, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats National Preparedness

Comments: 0

Top Chinese political adviser Tan Jianfeng on Tuesday called for the establishment of a national “data bank” of biometric data, including facial and fingerprint recognition data, to protect Chinese “national security” and “information security.”

China’s state-run Global Times quoted Tan suggesting biometric data must be aggressively harvested and zealously protected because it will become increasingly necessary for life in the pervasively-monitored Communist state, and the data is extremely difficult to replace if lost, corrupted, or stolen:

Data security has become an important issue concerning national security, said Tan Jianfeng, a member of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, noting that some key data, such as personal biometric data (face, fingerprint, and DNA data) have unique and non-renewable characteristics that can’t be recovered and changed once they are stolen and bring huge and irreversible risks.Tan, also the head of the Shanghai Information Security Trade Association, proposed to accelerate the establishment of relevant laws and regulations, and strictly standardize and implement the collection, storage and use of key data.He also suggested to establish data classification and management and a negative list should be made to prohibit the use of data in key areas such as biology and medicine on the internet.

UK-based technology firm Comparitech released a study in January that found China was “the world’s worst offender for its invasive use of biometric data.”

China’s oppressive use of fingerprint and facial recognition technology includes drones that flew through Chinese cities last year, using facial recognition to identify people violating coronavirus lockdown orders, facial systems that can identify people wearing masks, cameras that identify everyone who uses mass transit systems, and cameras that identify and shame jaywalkers and toilet-paper thieves.

Chinese companies have installed systems that monitor the brainwaves of workers to gauge their productivity. In case brainwave monitoring does not work, the Chinese are developing “smart cushions” that can monitor the other end of their employees.

This relentless march to total biometric surveillance is proceeding at a rapid clip even though polls show some 90 percent of Chinese citizens are uncomfortable with it. Tan Jianfeng’s call for a heavily-protected “national data bank” was part of the authoritarian government’s effort to reassure citizens that their biometrics will be protected.

“Ordinary people here in China aren’t happy about this technology but they have no choice. If the police say there have to be cameras in a community, people will just have to live with it. There’s always that demand and we’re here to fulfil it,” shrugged a representative of Taigusys, a firm that produces emotion-recognition technology, as quoted by the UK Guardian on Wednesday.

The Guardian noted that the emotion-recognition industry is “booming in China,” to a projected revenue of $36 billion in 2023, because dictator Xi Jinping and other top officials have “emphasized the creation of ‘positive energy’ as part of an ideological campaign to encourage certain kinds of expression and limit others.”

Taigusys boasts that its technology can also be used to “predict dangerous behavior by prisoners, detect potential criminals at police checkpoints, problem pupils in schools and elderly people experiencing dementia in care homes.” Emotion-recognition systems have been installed everywhere from nursing homes to schools.

Critics said this latest evolution of surveillance technology is based on physiological quackery, has few safeguards for privacy, discriminates against China’s oppressed racial technology, and has little demonstrable effectiveness at predicting sudden violent outbursts.

“A lot of biometric surveillance, I think, is closely tied to intimidation and censorship, and I suppose [emotion recognition] is one example of just that,” digital human rights analyst Vidushi Marda told the Guardian.

Photo: daoleduc/Getty Images

Link: Chinese Officials Want National ‘Data Bank’ of Faces and Fingerprints (breitbart.com)

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search