Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

Chinese Leader Xi Jinping Uses UN Platform to Level Criticism Against US

Wednesday, September 22, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/chinese-leader-xi-jinping-uses-un-platform-to-level-criticism-against-us_4010332.html

Chinese leader Xi Jinping virtually addresses the 76th Session of the U.N. General Assembly in New York on Sept. 21, 2021. (Spencer Platt/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Xi Jinping took several jabs at Washington on Sept. 21, in a prerecorded speech to the United Nations’ 76th General Assembly.

Separately, President Joe Biden has been criticized by Republican lawmakers for failing to use his speech at the U.N. headquarters in New York to hold China accountable on a number of issues.

“Recent developments in the global situation show once again that military intervention from the outside and so-called democratic transformation entail nothing but harm,” Xi said, without naming any country. However, the remark is an apparent reference to the tumultuous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan last month.

For over a month now, the Chinese regime has been using the chaotic U.S. pullout to carry out a propaganda campaign, painting the United States as an unreliable ally and questioning U.S. democracy. Most recently, on Sept. 18, China’s state-run media Global Times stated in an editorial that “the U.S. and the West ran away leaving a mess in Afghanistan.”

In another veiled criticism without naming any country, Xi stated the world needed to “reject the practice of forming small circles or zero-sum games.”

Just days earlier, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian used the same language during a daily press briefing. He accused Australia, the United States, and the United Kingdom of having an “outdated Cold War zero-sum mentality” with their new security alliance.

Under the security pact, the United States and the UK will share submarine technology with Australia, allowing the latter to field a fleet of at least eight nuclear-powered submarines by 2040.

Xi repeatedly called for cooperation and multilateralism in his speech, including a better “coordinated global COVID-19 response” among countries.

However, the international community has questioned China’s willingness to cooperate with the global fight against COVID-19, a disease caused by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) virus, since the regime decided to silence whistleblower doctors at the onset of the outbreak.

Beijing was criticized for failing to cooperate with a World Health Organization-led investigation team conducting groundwork in the Chinese city of Wuhan earlier this year. A U.S. intelligence report released last month stated that it couldn’t come to a conclusive assessment about the origins of the virus, given China’s refusal to cooperate.

Xi also proclaimed that “China has never and will never invade or bully others or seek hegemony.” The statement, however, would likely not sit well with China’s critics, considering the regime’s aggressive behaviors in the South China Sea and coercion tactics against Taiwan.

The Chinese leader made an environmental pledge during his speech, stating that Beijing “will not build new coal-fired power projects abroad.” However, he did not make any comment on domestic coal plants, considering that China is the world’s largest producer and consumer of coal.

Theresa Fallon, director of the Center for Russia Europe Asia Studies in Brussels, took to Twitter to say that Xi shouldn’t be given applause over the pledge, considering “how many [coal plants] they [China] have built before,” by pointing to data from the Global Coal Public Finance Tracker.

Xi’s speech is good as a reference, but the focus should be their actions rather than words, said Su Tzu-yun, an analyst at the Institute for National Defense Security Research in Taiwan.

“The Chinese Communist Party’s negotiation history has not been too glorious,” she told The Epoch Times, noting the Party had broken its promises of political freedom to Tibet and Hong Kong. “They negotiate when the situation is favorable, but resort to military aggression and bullying when it’s not,” he said.

Biden
Biden, in his first address at the U.N General Assembly since taking office, declared that the United States is “back at the table in international forums.” He also called for nations to “work together like never before” on global issues, including climate change and the spread of the CCP virus.

“We are not seeking a new Cold War or a world divided into rigid blocs,” Biden said, without naming any country.

He added, “The United States is ready to work with any nation that steps up and pursues peaceful resolution to shared challenges.”

Biden’s comment came after Antonio Guterres, the U.N. Secretary-General, raised concerns about a potential new cold war between China and the United States, in an interview with The Associated Press on Sept. 18.

Some observed that Biden didn’t say “China” in his speech. When asked why during a daily press briefing on Sept. 21, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said not mentioning China directly was “indicative of his [Biden’s] objective of laying out our proactive agenda of the big issues that we can work together on, including with China.”

Some Republican lawmakers pointed out Biden’s soft approach toward China.

“He should clearly state the threat China poses to the world—not pretend it doesn’t exist,” wrote Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) on Twitter about Biden’s omission of the word “China” in his speech.

Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) criticized Biden for resorting to “press release foreign policy” in his speech, according to a statement.

“Where was President Biden’s call to hold Communist China accountable for malign behavior[s], including the Chinese military’s growing threat against Taiwan and others, Beijing’s massive intellectual property theft, and China’s lack of transparency on COVID-19’s origins?” Hagerty added.

Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) called on Biden to “end his weak appeasement” of Xi, according to a statement released from his office after the president’s speech.

“As the world’s greatest beacon of freedom and democracy, the U.S. must do everything we can, in conjunction with our allies, to curb Communist China’s reach, counter their policies, and make the guilty pay for the ongoing human rights abuses, attacks on democracy and genocide against the Uyghurs,” Scott stated.

He added, “President Biden’s refusal to take this approach is nothing short of a dereliction of his duty and inexcusable display of weakness.”

Beijing has locked up over 1 million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities in internment camps in China’s far-western Xinjiang region.

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search