Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

China’s New Data Laws Force Tencent to Submit New Apps & Updates for Government Approval

Friday, December 3, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Cyber Security

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.cpomagazine.com/data-privacy/chinas-new-data-laws-force-tencent-to-submit-new-apps-updates-for-government-approval/

Photo: cpomagazine.com

One of China’s biggest tech companies has been told to pause any rollout of new apps and updates to existing apps until the government inspects them and grants its approval. Tencent, the conglomerate behind WeChat and Riot Games among many other popular apps, is now subject to added scrutiny from the government after multiple instances of running afoul of the country’s new data laws in the past year.

China’s state-run television has reported that the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) will now review all new apps and updates from the company to “ensure regulatory compliance” before they can be made available to the public. MIIT says that each review could take about a week to complete. In a statement to the press, Tencent said that it is “continuously working to enhance user protection features” and that its current lineup of apps remains available for download.

Tencent’s new apps face enhanced government scrutiny after nine apps flagged for violating new rules
The Chinese government has made strong moves in the realm of data protection in the past year, particularly in terms of regulating private companies’ handling of citizen personal information. A series of new data laws represent a sudden and serious change of course for the country’s tech industry, which until recent years had operated with relatively limited levels of regulation. The nature of the government allows for sudden orders and expectations of short turnaround times, which can leave new apps scrambling to comply. For example, tech firms were just directed on November 6 to revamp their privacy disclosures to make them more clear and easy to understand for end users, something that must be done by December.

Some companies have struggled to adapt to these changes, which in some cases have been extremely sudden. It appears that at least nine of Tencent’s apps did not meet the standards of the new data laws on four separate occasions, according to the MIIT. As of November 24 Tencent cannot publish new apps without government approval and must also submit updates to its existing apps for review, though the new data laws do not appear to be retroactively applied to app versions available prior to the 24th.

The MIIT did not name all of the specific apps that violated the new data laws. But Tencent’s biggest individual app, WeChat, already experienced a separate suspension earlier this year due to security shortcomings. The giant messaging and shopping app suspended new user signups for a week in late July, though this was not due to a public government order but instead appeared to be a preparatory move for the imminent rollout of the Personal Information Protection Law.

Additionally, Tencent was ordered in September to remove its internal blocks on links to competing apps (such as Douyin and Taobao); other apps that do this were also given the same order, with the government looking to put an end to “walled garden” online systems and promote free movement of traffic between all of these major apps.

Chinese government targets biggest tech firms with data laws
Some analysts believe that this, along with other recent moves, is intentional nitpicking at the country’s biggest firms to send a message to the country’s other technology and internet companies. The general idea is that if the government is willing to be harsh with companies of the scale and importance of Tencent, everyone else can expect the same treatment. MIIT has been active against other tech companies this month, however, flagging 29 other apps for violations of data laws that involved collection of personal information.

The Chinese government has taken issue not just with the former freewheeling use of personal data by tech firms within the country, but also the transfer of that information to the territory of foreign powers (who might intercept and make use of it as intelligence) and the tendency of its tech companies to want to offer IPOs abroad to make more money. In addition to its own direct measures, the country has encouraged app stores to review and test new apps on their own and flag those that might not be in compliance with the data laws.

Though the new data laws such as PIPL are primarily aimed at regulating and limiting the power of China’s domestic tech firms, they also apply to foreign firms that offer products and services to the country’s population or handle many forms of citizen personal information. China’s government reserves the right to levy very large fines against foreign companies, and even blacklist them from doing business in the country, for PIPL violations. The announcement of the law spurred an exodus of remaining Silicon Valley tech firms, with Apple (which still has much of its manufacturing rooted there despite shifting some of it out over the past two years) the one big name that still has a major presence in terms of operating an app store and offering new apps that might be subject to government inspection.

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search