Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

China Takes Aim at the West Amid Mounting Criticism of Its Ties With Russia

Thursday, March 10, 2022

Categories: ASCF News National Preparedness

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-offloads-blame-on-the-west-amid-mounting-criticism-of-its-cozy-ties-with-russia_4327643.html?slsuccess=1

Russian President Vladimir Putin (L) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (R) attend the Tsinghua Universitys ceremony, at Friendship Palace on April 26, 2019 in Beijing, China. (Kenzaburo Fukuhara - Pool/Getty Images)

As the Chinese regime feels growing heat over its refusal to take a stand against Russia’s invasion, it is turning back to its old tactic: blaming the West.

Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine has precipitated a worsening humanitarian crisis and given rise to allegations of war crimes, but the Chinese regime has placed blame for the conflict on the United States and its Western allies rather than Russia.

Chinese diplomats are claiming that Western sanctions on Russia are baseless, the United States has been profiting off of the Ukraine crisis, and the West has been responsible for hyping the Ukraine–Russia tensions to where it is today.

“The moves by the U.S.-led NATO have pushed the Russia–Ukraine tension to the breaking point,” Zhao Lijian, a spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, said at a March 9 press briefing.

Beijing, according to Zhao, has been a scapegoat during the affair, and the United States is the chief culprit that “racks its brains to discredit China.”

The remarks from Zhao, who has built a name for his combative tone against the West and for his embrace of virus conspiracy theories blaming the United States for the pandemic, suggests a defiant Beijing in face of rising pressure to do more to help end the crisis. They also came as the regime continued to make friendly overtures to Moscow, now made an international pariah.

Two weeks after Russia invaded Ukraine, Beijing has refused to call the action an “invasion.” Its state-run media outlets have instead taken up Russia’s preferred way of description: a “special military operation.”

The strongest characterization of the conflict from Beijing came on March 8, when Chinese leader Xi Jinping used the word “war” during a call with French and German leaders. Xi said he was “deeply grieved by the outbreak of war again on the European continent,” according to a readout. But Zhao said the next day that such wording signified no change in China’s position.

Beijing has also perpetuated Russia’s disinformation narrative that the U.S. military is running biological labs in Ukraine and storing “dangerous pathogens” there. A State Department official told The Epoch Times that the allegation was “Russian propaganda and total nonsense,” serving only to justify the military campaign against Ukraine.

The Chinese regime’s refusal to condemn Russia has drawn criticism from Western officials, with some U.S. lawmakers saying that Beijing has been deliberately unhelpful because of its strong ties to Russia. Given that both powers share a common goal of undermining the West, the Chinese regime can’t be counted on to provide support in bringing about a peaceful end to the conflict, the lawmakers told The Epoch Times.

While the Chinese regime insists that its relationship with Russia is “non-alliance,” it has also described Russia as a “most important strategic partner” and has pledged to further the bilateral relationship between the two countries regardless of “how precarious and challenging the international situation may be.”

As Western sanctions take a toll on Russia’s economy, the regime has also pledged to continue trading with Moscow as normal, although some analysts have suggested that Beijing would be reluctant to overtly help Russia evade sanctions, given the reputational and financial costs of doing so.

China’s state-owned UnionPay system has offered Russia some respite when Western card systems from Visa to Mastercard suspended operations in the country. Zhao also said on March 9 that China and Russia will “always maintain sound energy cooperation” and conduct oil and gas trade.

Washington has cautioned that it will “take steps” to ensure Chinese companies abide by commercial sanctions.

Russia and China, according to retired Lt. Col. Robert Maginnis, are seeking a new world order, one that’s “far more accepting of an authoritarian regime, rather than the liberal values that formulated the world order post-World War II.”

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search