Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

China Establishes a Mineral Resources Group to Strengthen Its Bargaining Power in Global Market

Thursday, August 11, 2022

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats

Comments: 0

Source: https://www.theepochtimes.com/china-establishes-a-mineral-resources-group-to-strengthen-its-bargaining-power-in-global-market_4654324.html

A truck transfers imported iron ore at a port in Rizhao in China's eastern Shandong Province on May 15, 2019. (STR/AFP via Getty Images)

China has set up a new state-owned group in charge of centralized iron ore procurement to increase its bargaining power in the international market.

China’s iron ore demand is huge. Data shows that since 2016, China’s annual iron ore imports have exceeded 1 billion tons. In 2021, China imported a total of 1.126 billion tons, accounting for nearly 70 percent of China’s iron ore consumption that year. Domestic iron ore resources are primarily of poor grade, and domestic output is low, making China highly dependent on imports.

Presently, global iron ore resources and supplies are highly concentrated in Australia and Brazil, and sellers have dominated the market for a long time.

According to data from the U.S. Geological Survey, from 2019 to 2021, Australian mining giants Rio Tinto, BHP Group Ltd., Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. (FMG Group), and Brazil’s four major mines of Vale do Rio Doce’s (Vale’s) iron ore production accounted for more than 40 percent of global production. The iron ore shipments by sea from the four major mines account for 60 to 70 percent of the world’s seaborne iron ore.

More than 80 percent of China’s iron ore imports come from Australia and Brazil. In 2021, China imported 694 million tons—nearly 62 percent of China’s total imports—from Australia and 238 million tons—or 21 percent—from Brazil.

The absolute position of Australian mines in China’s iron ore supply puts China in a “passive” position in the iron ore price game.

Furthermore, in April 2020, Canberra upset Beijing by asking for an independent international investigation into the origin of COVID-19. As a result, China implemented economic sanctions against Australia and restricted some Australian imports. It also forced China to confront the dominant position of Australian mines.

China Mineral Resources Group
On July 25, the China Mineral Resources Group Co., Ltd. was established in Beijing as a wholly state-owned company and a state-authorized investment institution. According to a July 28 resolution by China Iron and Steel Association, the new Mineral Resources Group will set up an iron ore working committee with China’s major iron and steel enterprises to be independently responsible for iron ore procurement in the global market.

Regarding the purpose of establishing the mineral resources group, Zhou Chengxiong, deputy director of the Strategic Issues Consulting and Research Center of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, said in an article on July 21 that Chinese steel companies can only change the passive situation of iron ore procurement by centralizing the procurement. The establishment of China Mineral Resources Group is precisely to concentrate the mining and import/export of ore and to do overall planning in order to gain advantages.

Simandou Iron Ore Mine
China is also waiting for the Simandou iron mine in Guinea, Africa, to start production. And according to Chinese media Caixin, the newly established China Mineral Resources Group will invest in overseas mines such as the Simandou mine.

In China’s game for pricing power over iron ore, Guinea’s Simandou mine is considered by Beijing as a critical mineral base that is expected to break the global iron ore supply pattern.

But, according to Mike Sun, a North American investment consultant and China expert, the planned capacity of this mine is limited, and Chinese steel mills will halt production if they run out of iron ore.

The current planned production capacity of Simandou iron ore is 100 million to 150 million tons, Sun told The Epoch Times. Even if this output can be achieved in the end, China’s annual iron ore imports exceed 1 billion tons, so China cannot do without iron ore from Australia and Brazil.

In addition, the Simandou iron ore has a big cost problem, Sun said. The mine’s initial investment in railways, wharves, and power generation facilities is huge. In the end, the CIF China price of Simandou iron ore is estimated to exceed $70-100 per ton; while the CIF China price of Australian iron ore is only about $20 per ton. The cost gap between the two is huge, and the Australian mining giant can easily generate large profits.

Since the beginning of this year, Guinea’s new government has twice suspended mining at the Simandou mine and asked foreign investors to speed up infrastructure construction.

Sun said the price of iron ore would ultimately be determined by supply and demand in the market. As long as China has a demand for iron ore, it will be difficult for China to control the iron ore price negotiation even if it integrates its resources.

Consolidation of China’s Key Mining Industries
China has been accelerating the merger of its major steel and other metal production companies recently.

At a conference on promoting the integration of central enterprises held in July, officials from the state-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission said that China’s current political and economic situation at home and abroad is grim. Therefore, it is necessary to speed up the integration between central enterprises to cope with the current complex situation.

In 2016, the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) State Council issued an action plan to consolidate 60 to 70 percent of China’s steel production in the hands of about 10 large groups by 2025.

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search