Alan W. Dowd is a Senior Fellow with the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes on the full range of topics relating to national defense, foreign policy and international security. Dowd’s commentaries and essays have appeared in Policy Review, Parameters, Military Officer, The American Legion Magazine, The Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, The Claremont Review of Books, World Politics Review, The Wall Street Journal Europe, The Jerusalem Post, The Financial Times Deutschland, The Washington Times, The Baltimore Sun, The Washington Examiner, The Detroit News, The Sacramento Bee, The Vancouver Sun, The National Post, The Landing Zone, Current, The World & I, The American Enterprise, Fraser Forum, American Outlook, The American and the online editions of Weekly Standard, National Review and American Interest. Beyond his work in opinion journalism, Dowd has served as an adjunct professor and university lecturer; congressional aide; and administrator, researcher and writer at leading think tanks, including the Hudson Institute, Sagamore Institute and Fraser Institute. An award-winning writer, Dowd has been interviewed by Fox News Channel, Cox News Service, The Washington Times, The National Post, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation and numerous radio programs across North America. In addition, his work has been quoted by and/or reprinted in The Guardian, CBS News, BBC News and the Council on Foreign Relations. Dowd holds degrees from Butler University and Indiana University. Follow him at twitter.com/alanwdowd.

ASCF News

Scott Tilley is a Senior Fellow at the American Security Council Foundation, where he writes the “Technical Power” column, focusing on the societal and national security implications of advanced technology in cybersecurity, space, and foreign relations.

He is an emeritus professor at the Florida Institute of Technology. Previously, he was with the University of California, Riverside, Carnegie Mellon University’s Software Engineering Institute, and IBM. His research and teaching were in the areas of computer science, software & systems engineering, educational technology, the design of communication, and business information systems.

He is president and founder of the Center for Technology & Society, president and co-founder of Big Data Florida, past president of INCOSE Space Coast, and a Space Coast Writers’ Guild Fellow.

He has authored over 150 academic papers and has published 28 books (technical and non-technical), most recently Systems Analysis & Design (Cengage, 2020), SPACE (Anthology Alliance, 2019), and Technical Justice (CTS Press, 2019). He wrote the “Technology Today” column for FLORIDA TODAY from 2010 to 2018.

He is a popular public speaker, having delivered numerous keynote presentations and “Tech Talks” for a general audience. Recent examples include the role of big data in the space program, a four-part series on machine learning, and a four-part series on fake news.

He holds a Ph.D. in computer science from the University of Victoria (1995).

Contact him at stilley@cts.today.

42% of Gmail scams targeted American users, Google finds

Wednesday, February 10, 2021

Categories: ASCF News Emerging Threats Cyber Security

Comments: 0

Who you are, where you are and how you experience online life are all major factors in whether you’re targeted for phishing and malware campaigns on Gmail, a joint Stanford University-Google study concluded.

The examination of 1.2 billion email-based phishing and malware attacks against Gmail users found that the risk of getting hit correlated at least in some significant measure to age, country, frequency of Gmail usage and past breach exposure.

Users in the U.S. were most frequently targeted, attracting 42% of the attacks that researchers tracked. U.K. users were the subject of 10% of attacks, while people in Japan came in third, with 5%.

Higher age groups also encountered higher odds of being targeted. For instance, the 55 to 64 age group was 1.64 times more likely to experience an attack compared to 18- to 24-year-olds.

Google publicized the study Tuesday, saying it teamed with Stanford researchers on in order to learn about how to better protect its most high-risk users.

“Our results represent a first step towards empirically identifying at-risk user populations and the promise of tailoring protections to those users that need it most,” the study reads. “We hope that future work will build on these insights to add a richer understanding of which factors influence risk, as well as to establish a minimum threshold for who needs high-friction protections.”

Beyond the details about whom hackers targeted, Google also said it learned more about attackers’ tendencies and those of botnets — infected armies of computers used in a variety of attacks. Their campaigns tend to be short, just one to three days. But they’re “fast-churning” and tend to be small in scale, with each email template going out to 100-1,000 targets on average and getting a lot of work done in a given week: 100 million phishing and malware emails in aggregate.

The highest-risk countries by average weekly likelihood of attack were clustered in Europe and Africa, even if most of the total volume of attacks still took aim at the U.S. The high volume of attacks on the U.S. and other English-speaking nations likely explained why attackers tended to use the same English email template across nations, although sometimes they regionalized them, such as in the case of Japan, where 78% of attacks occurred in the Japanese language.

The biggest factors appeared to be whether someone had been a victim in other breaches or whether they were frequent Gmail users, making the average odds of suffering an attack more than five times higher.

Other factors played smaller roles, such as users relying only on a mobile phone or personal computer facing lower risk of attack than multi-device users.

Photo: Gmail on the laptop screen illustration, Getty Images

Link: https://www.cyberscoop.com/gmail-hack-phishing-malware-stanford/

Comments RSS feed for comments on this page

There are no comments yet. Be the first to add a comment by using the form below.

Search